Tel: 0161 652 3443 | Email: sales@aeronacca.co.uk
Chinese New Year 2026 falls on 17 February. On the surface, that looks reassuringly late for shippers moving cargo from Asia to Europe.
In practice, however, the workable window for Q1 arrivals closes much earlier than the calendar suggests. Ongoing Red Sea disruptions, Cape of Good Hope routing, port congestion and Lunar New Year blank sailings have collectively stretched lead times to the point where a “late January departure” is no longer a reliable assumption.
For logistics service providers (LSPs), the real question is no longer “When is Chinese New Year?”
It is “When is the last realistic departure date to meet my customers’ Q1 delivery commitments?”
This article explores:
- How Red Sea disruption, Cape routing and CNY interact on Asia–Europe lanes
- A realistic CNY 2026 timeline from an LSP perspective
- Why late-January sailings often slip into March (or beyond)
- Practical planning steps to protect capacity, cost and customer confidence
The New Q1 Reality: CNY 2026 Meets Cape Routing
In a stable year, Asia–Europe planning was relatively straightforward. Many LSPs worked on assumptions such as:
- 30–40 days door-to-door from China to Northern Europe via Suez
- A two-week CNY slowdown that could be managed with modest inventory buffers
The last two years have fundamentally changed that baseline.
Security risks in the Red Sea have pushed many carriers to reroute services via the Cape of Good Hope, adding roughly 10–20 extra days to transit times, depending on service and port pair. Even where some lines are cautiously testing a return to Suez, routings remain fluid, and schedule reliability is volatile.
At the same time, North European ports have swung between manageable congestion and multi-day delays, particularly when weather disruption, labour issues or vessel bunching coincide.
The result is that Asia–Europe door-to-door lead times that once sat comfortably in the 30–40day range are now more often 40–50+ days, once you include:
- Pre-carriage to the export port
- Origin and destination terminal dwell
- Cape-extended Ocean transit
- Inland delivery at destination
The key point is simple: the CNY date has not moved much, but effective lead times have.
A Practical CNY 2026 Timeline for LSPs
While every supply chain is different, the Lunar New Year cycle follows a familiar operational pattern. For CNY 2026 (17 February), it can be broadly divided into four phases:
1. Pre-Rush (Early January to around 10 February)
Factories accelerate shipments ahead of shutdowns. Space tightens, spot rates rise, inland trucking becomes constrained and booking cut-offs creep forward.
2. Dead Zone (Approximately 10–24 February)
Many factories are closed or operating at skeleton capacity. Blank sailings increase, departures thin out, and schedules become less reliable.
3. Quality Gap (Late February to early March)
Factories reopen gradually, often at 30–50% capacity initially. New or returning staff increase quality-control risk, and output is uneven.
4. Normalisation (Mid-March onwards)
Production stabilises, equipment flows improve and schedules begin to recover, though Cape routing effects often persist.
What makes 2026 different from a “normal” late CNY year is that:
- The pre-rush starts earlier, as longer lead times force shippers to pull orders into early January.
- The dead zone feels longer, because blank sailings and extended voyages stretch the perceived disruption period.
For LSPs, this sharpens a critical question: which customers genuinely require Q1 arrival, and how far forward must cut-offs move to protect those commitments?
Why Late-January Departures Are No Longer “Safe”
Historically, a China–Northern Europe shipment might have looked like this:
- Pre-carriage and export dwell: 3–7 days
- Suez-routed Ocean transit: 30–40 days
- Destination port and inland delivery: 5–10 days
That equated to roughly 40–50 days door-to-door in a stable environment.
Under current conditions, a more cautious assumption is:
- Origin handling: still 3–7 days, but with higher risk of missed cut-offs
- Cape-routed Ocean transit: often 45–60 days port-to-port
- Destination handling: 3–7+ days, particularly at busy hubs
That pushes total lead times into the 50–70 day range for some corridors.
A shipment cutting off around 20–25 January can therefore land anywhere from early March to early April, depending on routing, transshipment and port performance. Many LSPs are already seeing late-January bookings arrive well into March, with very little margin for recovery if anything slips.
The message is not that everything will arrive late — but that January calendar dates no longer guarantee Q1 delivery.
Key Risk Zones Around CNY 2026
Capacity and Rate Risk in the Pre-Rush
In the weeks before CNY, carriers use blank sailings to manage demand and support rates. Spot pricing often spikes, and inland capacity tightens as drivers take extended leave. Waiting to “see what January spot looks like” increasingly means discovering that space, not price, is the constraint.
Equipment and Origin Congestion
Longer voyages disrupt equipment cycles, creating imbalances , such as high-cube shortages at certain Chinese ports. Combined with pre-holiday export surges and blanked sailings, this can produce sharp congestion spikes at origin.
Rolling Risk During the Dead Zone
During and immediately after CNY, sailings are merged or cancelled, routings change at short notice, and transhipment hubs reshuffle priorities. Containers without priority status are particularly exposed to rolling and extended dwell.
Why Information Velocity Matters More Than Ever
CNY creates a paradox: physical flows slow down, but operational risk increases. Fewer sailings, reduced staffing and slower responses mean that who sees the problem first often matters more than who has the lowest rate.
Early visibility of events such as blank sailings, skipped port calls or extended dwell can be the difference between proactive mitigation and reactive firefighting. Event-level tracking allows LSPs to adjust inland plans, manage demurrage exposure and communicate realistic options to customers before choices narrow.
You may not be able to change the route a vessel takes — but you can change how quickly you understand what that means for a specific shipment.
A Practical CNY 2026 Playbook for LSPs
Define what “Q1 arrival” really means
Different customers have different thresholds: retail launch dates, DC receiving windows or production line starts. Work backwards from those requirements using realistic lead times.
Set conservative cut-offs by corridor
For each Asia–Europe lane, establish a planning range based on current routing reality, not historical Suez assumptions. Build in buffer for critical flows.
Secure capacity early where it matters most
Mini-contracts, fixed-rate windows and early equipment discussions reduce the risk of being squeezed out during the pre-rush.
Treat visibility as a contingency tool
High-frequency, event-based tracking during peak CNY weeks supports faster decisions around rolling risk, dwell time and last free day exposure.
Plan customer communications in advance
Clear, consistent messaging before and during CNY reduces surprises and helps customers make informed trade-offs between cost, speed and certainty.
From Calendar Date to Lead-Time Reality
Chinese New Year 2026 is still just one date: 17 February. But for Asia–Europe logistics, it sits on top of a lead-time curve that has shifted decisively to the right.
Longer voyages, higher variability and lingering congestion mean that safe Q1 cut-offs are now measured in weeks before CNY, not days. LSPs that combine realistic planning assumptions, early capacity decisions and faster visibility will navigate the season with fewer shocks.
CNY 2026 should not be planned as a “normal” late-holiday year. The calendar has not changed — but the routes, schedules and risks have.
